Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Richard Farmer's column >>

RICHARD FARMER

Home Page
Journalist and wine maker
Articles Posted: 416  Links Seeded: 2421
Member Since: 8/2006  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

An Abortion of a Policy

Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:34 AM EDT
world-news, china, abortion, family-planninf
By Richard Farmer
Advertise | AdChoices

Social engineering is a wonderful thing to behold. Attempts by do-gooders to force changes in human behaviour invariably lead to some fascinating consequences. And nowhere has that phenomenon become more apparent than in modern China where 28 years of rigorously enforced family planning have resulted in the country having 37 million more males than females.

Now in some ways thee one child per family policy introduced in 1979 has had a beneficial result. According to the government controlled Xinhua newsagency, the policy has helped China to reduce the speed of population growth, delaying by four years the 1.3 billion figure reached at the beginning of 2005. Among the prices paid is a sex ratio that has given China a surplus of males three and a half times the total number of men in Australia.

The reason for the growing imbalance is clear. When limited to one child, couples prefer, for a variety of cultural reasons, for that child to be a male. Female foetuses are regularly aborted. Statistics from the Information Office of the State Council show the sex ratio for newborns is 119 boys to 100 girls. The China Family Planning Association (CFPA), recently called for attention to be given to "the severe challenges in population affairs." The CFPA drew attention to the fact that the sex ratio for newborns aged zero to four had reached 163.5 boys to 100 girls by the end of 2005 in Lianyungang, a city in east China's Jiangsu Province. Similarly alarming figures have also been recorded in Hainan, Henan, Guangdong and Anhui, with Hainan chalking up a ratio of 136 to 100. A total of 99 cities had sex ratios higher than 125 and the national average figure reached 119 in 2005, the CFPA said. The Association maintains the normal sex ratio should be kept below 107:100, according to the United Nations standards.
In the face of such a dramatic change in the population balance it appears that there will soon be changed and stricter enforcement of the one child policy. A report in the People's Daily quoted Wang Yongqing, deputy head of the Office of Legislative Affairs of the State Council saying "several laws and regulations on family planning have been listed on State Council's legislative plan for 2007 including the regulation to ban sex-selection abortion." The State Council are studying the regulation and will release it at proper time, he said.

The new regulation will make clear the responsibility of governments and related departments at all levels and to ban sex-selection abortion for non-medical purpose. Though sex-selection is banned by the existing Population and Family Planning Law and the Law on Maternal and Infant Health, there are currently no provisions on the applicable punishment for such acts.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Richard Farmer's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (0)
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com