A young woman with a weary look sits at the doorstep of her husband's house in Iwemba sub-county, Bugiri District. Her exhaustion typifies the misery faced by thousands of Sabiny girls in Bugiri where Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) does not give them an opportunity to go to school.
"Life is hard, as girls we are expected to undergo FGM at ages 12-14 as preparation for marriage. We are married off and not expected to divorce even when our husband misbehaves," says Milika Cherop, the only girl out of about 5,000 Sabiny to reach senior six.
Although the country is embracing Universal Primary Education and Universal Secondary Education, Cherop says the Sabiny, are stuck to their traditional values that has seen many young girls forcefully undergo FGM and forced into marriage at a tender age.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (21)
Terrible, barbaric misogyny!
- 5 votes
The object of genital mutilation is to remove the clitoris, so the woman will not equate sex to pleasure, and never experience a orgasm in her life time. The thinking behind it is that if she does not have an orgasm, she will not cheat. Like neutering an animal. This is a very ancient practice.
- 2 votes
What I also find upsetting is those in the west who defend thiis barbarism on the grouns that we must accept other cultures, and therefore not criticize any of their practices.
- 5 votes
In my own opinion, I find the practice barbaric and extremely sexist, only the male reigns supreme, wilth the woman a subordinate. A variation of the practice exists in Saudi Arabia, where the clotoris is sewn shut, and the groom cuts open the stitches, on the wedding night. This is to guarantee the woman is a virgin. Hard to believe that we are in the 21st century.
- 4 votes
Some people in Uganda obviously have a few hangups because it is the same country that is introducing the death penalty for some homosexual activities.
- 3 votes
Uganda?
Not surprised.
You'd think that the Pope would say pass down some edict like "You -- who call yourselves Catholics -- need to stop genitally mutilating your pre-pubescent females. Or, at least stop doing it in the name of Our Religion."
But, the Catholic Church has stayed silent about this atrocity.
Again...not surprised.
- 2 votes
When I hear people complain about america... I always think "well, you could ahve been born in a place like THAT!"
- 4 votes
Yeah...then I think:
I could have been born in a place like New Zealand.
- 1 vote
What have you got against sheep?
- 1 vote
Uhhh. No. I meant that New Zealand is hella cool.
- 1 vote
if nothing else, that's what we learned from LOTR lol
- 1 vote
I think it should only be allowed if the man has to go thru the castration process too. Of course, this would mean no kids, so the tradition would die off, which would be a good thing.
- 2 votes
Apparently, the practice has been outlawed. 10 years in prison for anyone who performs the act and lifetime for anyone who forces a girl to be mutilated.
Milika Cherop, Sylivia Chebet,19, Sulai Chekwemboi, 17, Agnes Cheroitich, 16, and Anne Chellangat are determined to inspire other Sabiny girls to change the traditions of the community. “We refused to do FGM, stood by our word and remained at school. Our parents intimidated and threatened us but we vowed to drag them to court if they used force. Our target is to inspire others to say no to FGM but say yes to education,” Chebet says.
Hooray for these girls for wanting to educate other girls in their predicament. This is a terrible thing to do to any human and those who practice these atrocities should be held accountable! The media bringing attention to this is a start but out the outcry of the public is what is essential to stop these inhumane traditions.
- 1 vote
Before I start my opinion I just want to recount my grandmothers teenage life.
There was a man and a woman who were married. That man is my grandfather, that woman is not my grandmother. They had two children. The mother died shorty after giving birth.
That mother had a younger sister, who has 4 years old at the time of her death. Now the father did not want to marry a stranger as he thought the new wife may disrespect or not care enough for the children. He waited 10 years for that 4 year old sister to grow up until she was at the age of 14 so she could marry him (strange how he cradled her at her birth then later married her, just a thought).
This marriage was illegal in the eyes of my Orthodox church as people are not permitted to marry their in-laws. However he was determined not to marry a stranger for the sake of the children, and so was married under either the Catholic or Anglican church (can't remember exactly which one)
When they were married, it is still unclear to me whether she was forced into it or whether she was asked to be married.
When they married, the two children were ages 12 and 10, and the new wife was 14. However the maturity and responsibility she showed was amazing. Now this father was a very tough man, and had told the 14 yr old mother that she will wash the children's feet and drink that water (trying to point out the children are the first priority).
These two had 5 more children, one of them my mother. That 14 year old is now my grandmother.
Now to the actual discussion. I personally don't like this tradition, however in the eyes of their community is was percieved as acceptable (not required however). Other countries see our media as immoral. We see certain traditions as barbaric. However, it all comes down to how much harm it will cause the people affected by the tradition. I do not like seeing people bash other cultures for their traditions but keep in mind they would be doing the same thing. I'm watching family guy at the moment and I'm pretty sure if my grandparents were watching it they would call it dispicable.
My point is hopefully time will take care of things as it has done in the past, until then tradition bashing shouldn't be condoned. I personally don't like the tradition, but that doesn't justify any bashing.
However iIf they require assistance then we should provide it if possible. But keep in mind the reaction of the host country, imagine if another country came and removed South Park and Family Guy in the name of goodwill.
- 1 vote
It seems to me that tradition brought great harm to the 14 year old.
In some ways yes and in some ways no. It robbed her of a teenage life but it was an extremely gracious act on her part. She cared for the children and her children greatly, and is an extremely devout Christian.
Back then most women in her area became housewives but a small percentage still went to uni. That is why she didn't object to the marriage as it was a social norm. Now more women are pursuing a lengthy education which is good, however contradicts their tradition. That is why it is an issue now. Back then it was normal to them. I asked my mother on my grandmother's reaction to the marriage and she said that my grandmother asked her mother whether or not she should say yes, turns out it was as I could say 'partially' her choice. Her mother told her she should say yes and so she did.
She is the most cheerful woman I have ever met, and follows her religion with an extreme passion. I respect her greatly and love her dearly. She does not regret her choices and is still in communication with her family all the time, my mother and her talk on the phone pretty much everyday for at least a half hour.
- 1 vote
At age 14, the mind has not developed to the point to make these kinds of decisions, then or now. What she did was fulfill an obligation forced upon her and made the best out of a sad situation.
I can't say the situation was 'forced' upon her as she still had the last say but there was to a degree an amount of pressure on her. That is why I really admire her, making the best out of a situation is a true virtue which not many people have.
However I disagree with you on the point that at the moment 14 yr olds cant make these decisions. There is a lot more influence now on teenagers then there was back then, mainly due to the internet and TV etc. These girls now have seen other girls pursue educations in university and to continue their whole highschooling. Back then it was often unheard of not to relinquish your education for marriages sake.
- 1 vote
Times are changing, amusedreader, and I hope the change is positive. The human condition changes as time progresses.
That is my point, times are changing which leads to the ends or beginnings of traditions. There are always both positive and negative changes that come with it but let's not get into that. However we must keep in mind the context of these people facing the changes.
Just in case I haven't made it clear enough I am against forced marriages and encourage all people to pursue whatever extent of education they desire.
- 1 vote
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



